| Author |
Message |
mithat
|
|
Post subject: aptosid Wikipedia article
 Posted: 09.09.2014, 20:06
|
|
Joined: 2011-12-15
Posts: 31
Status: Offline
|
|
| The first paragraph of the aptosid Wikipedia refers to aptosid in the past tense. There are a few other places in the article where it's referred to in the past tense as well. I was going to edit this but thought it might be prudent to check here first. To the best of my knowledge, aptosid is still not dead. Can anyone see any reason not to change the past tenseness in the article? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
slh
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: aptosid Wikipedia article
Posted: 09.09.2014, 20:36
|
|
Joined: 2010-08-25
Posts: 962
Status: Offline
|
|
Isn't it quite futile to argue about wikipedia semantics?
As far as aptosid is concerned, it's alive and kicking (as http://aptosid.com/debian/dists/unstable/InRelease might, or might not - depending on the particular point of view of the spectator, confirm, respectively refute), regardless of what wikipedia thinks about it. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
mithat
|
|
|
Post subject: RE: aptosid Wikipedia article
Posted: 11.09.2014, 22:40
|
|
Joined: 2011-12-15
Posts: 31
Status: Offline
|
|
| Indeed. For every opinion on the Internet, there is an equal and opposite opinion. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
